It uoz praabebli a kopla iirz ago bai nau xat ai frst divaizd xis nu spelliq sistm fr Inglic. Xen last nait ai uoz rydiq aan Uikipydia abaut spelliq reform aidiez and got ryintrested in mai oun. Ai revaizd it in a fiu ki eriez last nait and steid op a bit tu leit dwiq so (az ai em uount tu du dwiq somxiq or oxr aan x kmpiwtr almoust alueiz xyz deiz). Its bigest edvantedj kmpeerd tu oxr prepouzd Inglic spelliq-reform sistms iz its rellativ ekkenaamekalliti, moustli du ai xink tu singl saundz byiq repprezennted bai singl letrz. A kaamplekeicn araizez knsrniq x spelliq ov striqz kmpraiziq vaulz faloud bai "r" or "l" or at xi endz ov uerdz, bot xis iz priti djostefaiebl, ai xiqk, bekoz it eidz x knsaisnes ov x sistm and also akceli briqz it a bit klousr xan it oxruaiz uud bi tu norml Inglic spelliq. Xis uud, ai xiqk, meik it yzyr for a pryviesli literet Inglic spykr tu lrn tu ryd and rait in it. And yvn xo xis sistm uud bi mor kmpleks fr a naan-raitr ov standrd Inglic tu lrn az a rezollt, it iz still holi reggielr and simplr bai far xan standrd Inglic spelliq, and hens still holdz xat lardj edvantedj ouvr it. If iu hav red xis hol poust xru tu hir and hav ondrstud it al, xat uud lend krydns tu mai haipaaxesyz hir. Let mi no if iu did! It's fon tu rait in xis and rilli priti kuik uons iu get a litl praktes.
EDDIT: ai meid som edjostmnts tu x sistm from uen ai eridjeneli pousted; kan iu figier aut uot xe ar? Also, dag, "ekkenaamekalliti" iz nau sikstyn letrz, ueeraz "economicality" iz ounli xrtyn! Aan xi oxr hand, "xrtyn" iz ounli faiv letrz, uail "thirteen" haz eit. Ai xink in xi agreget uon kan ekspekt kaamn cort uerdz tu bekom cortr and laaq, mor specelaizd uerdz tu bekom laangr, uitc aat tu myn xat xis sistm iz ouveral mor knsais xan standrd spelliq. And indyd it iz, az iu kan si if iu kmpeer it tu x seim pasedj in standrd spelliq xat's insaid xi LD-kot. (Ies, ai tuk x taim tu du xis yvn xo ai xud bi pakiq op tu hed tu Uilliemztaun temaro. Hm, ai laik x luk ov "temaro.")
how easily can you read this
It was probably a coupla years ago by now that I first devised this new spelling system for English. Then last night I was reading on Wikipedia about spelling reform ideas and got reinterested in my own. I revised it in a few key areas last night and stayed up a bit too late doing so (as I am wont to do doing something or other on the computer almost always these days). Its biggest advantage compared to other proposed English spelling-reform systems is its relative economicality, mostly due I think to single sounds being represented by single letters. A complication arises concerning the spelling of strings comprising vowels followed by "r" or "l" or at the ends of words, but this is pretty justifiable, I think, because it aids the conciseness of the system and also actually brings it a bit closer than it otherwise would be to normal English spelling. This would, I think, make it easier for a previousl literate English speaker to learn to read and write in it. And even though this system would be more complex for a non-writer of standard English to learn as a result, it is still wholly regular and simpler by far than standard English spelling, and hence still holds that large advantage over it. If you have read this whole post through to here and have understood it all, that would lend credence to my hypotheses here. Let me know if you did! It's fun to write in this and really pretty quick once you get a little practice.
EDIT: I made some adjustments to the system from when I originally posted; can you figure out what they are? Also, dag, "ekkenaamekalliti" is now sixteen letters, whereas "economicality" is only thirteen! On the other hand, "xrtyn" is only five letters, while "thirteen" has eight. I think in the aggregate one can expect common short words to become shorter and long, more specialized words to become longer, which ought to mean that this system is overall more concise than standard spelling. And indeed it is, as you can see if you compare it to the same passage in standard spelling that's inside the LJ-cut. (Yes, I took the time to do this even though I should be packing up to head to Williamstown tomorrow. Hm, I like the look of "temaro.")
July 12 2006, 14:51:21 UTC 5 years ago
July 12 2006, 15:08:14 UTC 5 years ago
July 13 2006, 14:19:31 UTC 5 years ago
And for the record, iu gyz aar insein.
July 13 2006, 14:56:47 UTC 5 years ago
July 13 2006, 22:34:22 UTC 5 years ago
You will never cease to amaze me with your language-related ideas. Professor Sanders would be proud. :)
July 13 2006, 23:55:37 UTC 5 years ago
July 15 2006, 00:11:44 UTC 5 years ago
Seriously though, spelling reform proposals are becoming so common, I predict they'll soon become our currency. Twenty systems of spelling reform will equal roughly a nickel, depending on the strength of the IPA, I'm not sure.
July 15 2006, 23:30:51 UTC 5 years ago